Wednesday, September 25, 2013

A500.7.3.RB_RutbellGreg - Blog - Quantitative Research


Quantitative Research Summary    

 

Gregory Rutbell           

 

25 September 2013         

 

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide Campus       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quantitative research attempts precise measurement of something. In business research, quantitative methodologies usually measure consumer behavior, knowledge, opinions, or attitudes. Such methodologies answer questions related to how much, how often, how many, when, and who. Although the survey is not the only methodology of the quantitative researcher, it is considered a dominant one. (Cooper & Schindler, 2014)

Besides the purpose of the research, this process sets up several key distinctions between qualitative and quantitative research, elaborated in Exhibit 1, including the level of researcher involvement; sampling methodology and size; data collection processes; including participant preparation and researcher and research sponsor involvement; data type and preparation; data analysis and timing; processes for reaching insights and meaning; time frame of insight discovery; and the level of data security. (Cooper & Schindler, 2014)

In the case of quantitative data, both the researcher and research sponsor have less significant involvement in collecting and interpreting data compared to qualitative analysis. With large quantitative studies, the researcher who interprets the data and draws conclusions from it is rarely the data collector and often has no contact at all with the participant. In quantitative research, identical data are desired from all participants, so evolution of methodology is not acceptable. (Cooper & Schindler, 2014)

Quantitative data often consist of participant responses that are coded, categorized, and reduced to numbers so that these data may be manipulated for statistical analysis. One objective is the quantitative tally of events or opinions, called the frequency of responses. Qualitative data are all about texts. Detailed descriptions of events, situations, and interactions, either verbal or visual, constitute the data. Data may be contained within transcriptions of interviews or video focus groups, as well as in notes taken during those interactions.  But by definition they generate reams of words that need to be coded and analyzed by humans for meaning. While computer software is increasingly used for the coding process in qualitative research, at the heart of qualitative research is the researcher - and his or her experience - framing and interpreting the data. (Cooper & Schindler, 2014)

Multimillion-dollar strategies may lose their power if the competitor acts too quickly. Data security is therefore of increasing concern. Both group and individual interviewing, the mainstay techniques of qualitative research, can be conducted in highly secure environments. In comparison, once a quantitative survey or field observation or experiment is started, it is quickly common knowledge among a research sponsor's competitors. Although the data might not be known, the area of inquiry often can be determined. For example, in a test market - an experimental quantitative design - a research sponsor 's competitors can often observe and extract insights right along with the sponsor. In quantitative research, unless a researcher is collecting his or her own data, interviewers or data collectors are rarely involved in the data interpretation or analysis stages. Although data collectors contribute to the accuracy of data preparation, their input is rarely, if ever, sought in the development of data interpretations. While qualitative research is being used to increasingly because of the methodologies' ability to generate deeper understanding, it is still perceived by many senior-level executives as a stepchild of quantitative data collection. This is primarily due to qualitative research's use of nonprobability sampling, the smaller sample sizes involved, and the nonprojectability of the results to a broader, target population. (Cooper & Schindler, 2014)

Triangulation is the term used to describe the combining of several qualitative methods or combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative studies may be combined with quantitative studies to increase the perceived quality of the research, especially when a quantitative study follows a qualitative one and provides validation for the qualitative findings. Four strategies for combining methodologies are common in business research:

 

1.      Qualitative and quantitative research can be conducted simultaneously.

 

2.      A qualitative study can be ongoing while multiple waves of quantitative studies are done, measuring changes in behavior and attitudes over time.

 

3.      A qualitative study can precede a quantitative study, and a second qualitative study might then follow the quantitative study, seeking more clarification.

 

4.      A quantitative study can precede a qualitative study.  

 

Many researchers recognize that qualitative research compensates for the weaknesses of quantitative research and vice versa. These forward thinkers believe that the methodologies complement rather than rival each other. (Cooper & Schindler, 2014)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 1 (Cooper & Schindler, 2014, p. 147)

 
Qualitative
Quantitative
Focus of Research
·   Understand and interpret
·   Describe, explain, and predict
Researcher Involvement
·   High - researcher is participant or catalyst
·   Limited; controlled to prevent bias      
Research Purpose
·   In-depth understanding; theory building
·   Describe or predict; build and test theory       
Sample Design
·   Nonprobability; purposive
·   Probability
Sample Size
·   Small
·   Large
Research Design
·   May evolve or adjust during the course of the project
·   Often uses multiple methods simultaneously or sequentially
·   Consistency is not expected
·   Involves longitudinal approach
·   Determined before commencing the project
·   Uses single method or mixed methods
·   Consistency is critical
·   Involves either a cross-sectional or longitudinal approach        
Participant Preparation
·   Pretasking is common
·   No preparation desired to avoid biasing the participant
Data Type and Preparation
·   Verbal or pictorial descriptions
·   Reduced to verbal codes (sometimes with computer assistance)
·   Verbal descriptions
·   Reduced to numerical codes for computerized analysis        
Data Analysis
·   Human analysis following computer or human coding; primarily nonquantitative
·   Forces researcher to see the contextual framework of the phenomenon being measured - distinction between facts and judgments less clear
·   Computerized analysis - statistical and mathematical methods dominate
·   Analysis may be ongoing during the project
·   Maintains clear distinction between facts and judgments       
Insights and Meaning
·   Deeper level of understanding is the norm; determined by type and quantity of free-response questions
·   Researcher participation in data collection allows insights to form and to be tested during the process
·   Limited by the opportunity to probe respondents and the quality of the original data collection instrument
·   Insights follow data collection and data entry, with limited ability to reinterview participants
  
Research Sponsor Involvement
·   May participate by observing research in real time or via taped interviews 
·   Rarely has either direct or indirect contact with participant 
Feedback Turnaround
·   Smaller sample sizes make data collection faster for shorter possible turnaround
·   Insights are developed as the research progresses, shortening data analysis
·   Larger sample sizes lengthen data collection; Internet methodologies are shortening turnaround but inappropriate for many studies  
·   Insight development follows data collection and entry, lengthening research process; interviewing software permits some tallying of responses as data collection progresses       
Data Security
·   More absolute given use of restricted access facilities and smaller sample sizes  
·   Act of research in progress is often known by competitors; insights may be gleaned by competitors for some visible, field-based studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

 

Cooper, Donald R. & Schindler, Pamela S. (2014) Business Research Methods (12th ed). New     York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

No comments:

Post a Comment